- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Location
- Niketown, OR
Cool that?s what I had read as well. Also, it?s my understanding that going the 16v route is pointless unless you plan on building the block because an 8v will do the same job up until the same power level as the 16v. Is that true?
What?
Keeping the same turbo and manifold, my car puts down more power with half the boost after the 16v swap, over a wider powerband. Does that make sense?
I'm not quite understanding what your last sentence means, but a 16V head flows a lot more air than an 8V. And that makes more HP. You *can* make power on an 8V head, but you have to put a lot of money into head work and cams, and throw more boost at it.
I do think the use case of a 16V swap is getting a bit pinched, however, between BIG turbo 8V builds on one end and LS/2JZ swaps on the other. It's easier in many respects than a complete motor swap since the bottom end is still stock. But a turbo 16V, especially in a 240, needs a lot of custom parts to make it find and work.
Packaging is a bit challenging with creature comforts yes.